They can call it whatever they want. We know what it was.
The wall to wall coverage does say one thing: it's rare enough—so far—in the United States that we can take the time to examine every single facet of this dirtbag's filthy Muslim life...and publicly wonder....
..."Why Did He Do It?"
I don't think they bother doing that in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, or, say, Israel. They pretty much know the minute it happens.
I love the tender care the news media takes to not call it a "Muslim Terrorist Attack" while they turn over every tiny stone in his background... trying to find "clues" to his motivation.
Can we please start with the assumption—when someone with a Arabic name cold-bloodedly murders a bunch of innocent Americans—that he's a fucking filthy Muslim terrorist rather than pretending we have NO IDEA what could POSSIBLY make a MUSLIM man do such a thing....while we go to extraordinary lengths to avoid the obvious?
Is that possible in our absurdly weak-kneed, politically correct, "sensitive", suicidal America?
Did anyone reading this doubt, the moment they heard this savage's name, what the hell happened?
I didn't think so.
Does anyone think the firing squad is out of the question? At dawn tomorrow?
Didn't think so.
The Gunslinger, ETOIS