They can call it whatever they want. We know what it was.
The wall to wall coverage does say one thing: it's rare enough—so far—in the United States that we can take the time to examine every single facet of this dirtbag's filthy Muslim life...and publicly wonder....
..."Why Did He Do It?"
I don't think they bother doing that in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, or, say, Israel. They pretty much know the minute it happens.
I love the tender care the news media takes to not call it a "Muslim Terrorist Attack" while they turn over every tiny stone in his background... trying to find "clues" to his motivation.
Can we please start with the assumption—when someone with a Arabic name cold-bloodedly murders a bunch of innocent Americans—that he's a fucking filthy Muslim terrorist rather than pretending we have NO IDEA what could POSSIBLY make a MUSLIM man do such a thing....while we go to extraordinary lengths to avoid the obvious?
Is that possible in our absurdly weak-kneed, politically correct, "sensitive", suicidal America?
Did anyone reading this doubt, the moment they heard this savage's name, what the hell happened?
I didn't think so.
Does anyone think the firing squad is out of the question? At dawn tomorrow?
Didn't think so.
The Gunslinger, ETOIS
So, Erm, How Did You Get that Bottle?
11 hours ago