Sunday, February 08, 2009

Back to Basics, Again.

I found a great single page essay. It encapsulates all the stuff we've been saying for months. Somehow, unlike so many other articles on the current financial crisis, Brian Wesbury makes it clear and straightforward.

Here is a most succinct argument against government intervention:

"The reality is that every dollar the federal government spends must be borrowed or taxed from the private sector. And the more resources the government usurps from the private sector, the less job creation occurs."

No matter how smart we are, we seem to always forget that the government has no money of its own. And that if it spends money, it comes from citizens, who then cannot spend it themselves. Every dime the government has reduces the wealth of the nation. Government doesn't create wealth. It steals it from those who do. Can you think of a better argument against the leviathan being created by Zero and the Dems in Congress?

Government is the enemy of progress, efficiency and innovation.

"It is also true that most government spending is less efficient than private sector spending. While there may be a few areas that government spending makes sense -- let's say defense or some R&D -- the vast majority of government spending has nothing to do with creating new wealth.
Government is not the solution. Government is the problem.
"It often competes against the private sector -- the postal service and Amtrak -- and much of it is pure re-distribution."
Unemployment and Stimulus by Brian Wesbury.

The Gunslinger

4 comments:

  1. Proof of Insanity,if one subscribes to "Doing the same thing over,expecting different results" axiom.There MUST be another,psychologist's term for this political disease,first evidenced in the Soviet's "plans".For now,"imbecility" will do...

    ReplyDelete
  2. The problem is so many people know so little history, they don't even know that it's happened before.

    "Don't know....repeat"....

    ReplyDelete
  3. There is another possibility, other than "not learning from history"...
    It's scarier.
    "Perhaps men do in fact learn from History, but their desire is not for any sort of happiness and liberty, but for their opposites. They study and learn what creates liberty, and then do the opposite. Their wish is not for Declarations of Independence but for gulags. Their guides are not Socrates and Jefferson but Nebuchadrezzar and Napoleon."

    From : http://www.thereturnofscipio.com/?p=1174

    ReplyDelete
  4. Christy...there I go again, assuming everyone has the same motivation I do.

    When will I learn.

    The drive to power is strong in some, and that includes the enslavement of others.

    I just want freedom for myself which naturally implies freedom for everyone else.

    I can't imagine being another way...so I fall into the trap of assuming others are just ignorant or stupid instead of recognizing that some are simply evil.

    Sad, that.

    But thanks for the reminder.

    ReplyDelete