"National Journal's respected correspondent Stuart Taylor wrote, 'The media can no longer be trusted to provide accurate and fair campaign reporting and analysis.' "This will not come as surprise. Only confirmation that Big Media in America can no longer be trusted to tell the truth. And when you think about it, it's cataclysmic.
The implications for our well-being are staggering.
Obie the Precious is offered to us without flaw. But the man we will get, should he be elected, is a hollow and puerile and dangerous one.
So often, Conservatives are accused of "lying" about Global Warming and it's implications. We answer that we too have children we love, that we don't want to inherit a sick planet. We care about air and water and all growing things, but just do not believe that Global Warming is TRUE!
I can't explain, however what the members of the Press are thinking when they patently lie and coverup for a political Party and candidate. Do they think that the loss of all credibility by the Media, that the advancing of propaganda over truth will produce a better world? Don't they have children they love? Don't they understand the poison they are injecting into the world by actively supporting the suppression of truth and integrity.
It has been clear for a long time that Modern Liberals, like their predecessors and intellectual godfathers, the Communists/Fascists believe the end justifies any means, but it's still shocking to find that they are willing to abandon all honor and virtue in order to concoct a lie in order to install an unfit man as leader of their own country.
One cannot fathom what benefit they imagine it will bring.
It would be at least marginally different if they, having exposed and examined the life, the associations, the policies, the mistakes, the limit or expansiveness of knowledge and experience of a candidate, found him their favorite choice because they really believed he was the best man for the job.
But to propagandize, to cheat, to lie for, to assassinate the character of opponents of a man about whom they know almost nothing...or refuse to reveal what they do know because he would be soundly rejected by serious voters...is beyond my understanding.
What do they hope to accomplish? What is the pay-off? Nothing more than the first Black president?
Don't they know that the first Black President, fair or not, like it or not, has to be brilliant? Has to be much better than the 43 White men he follows? And yet, they advance this empty, hollow, unprepared, unskilled, inexperienced man for the job, whom they insist is the best thing since Jesus.
Have they considered the reaction when the depth of his unpreparedness is revealed by his own actions and failures—when real consequences follow that cannot be hidden or explained away by a biased editorial?
It may be that there are simply no longer any adults in Big Media; that it is as juvenile and jejune as the rest of the Left, completely incapable of anticipating results or understanding consequences.
Perhaps the thrill of being party to the "historic" even of electing a "Black" President is, literally, as far as any of them have bothered to think.
Big Media, either way, has proven itself stupid, incompetent and malicious—at best.
We have to make sure they are not allowed to re-establish an information monopoly via the "Fairness Doctrine". It's damn near as important as protecting the Second Amendment. And believe me when I tell you—for me...that's saying something!
Truth is a Weapon as surely as an AK-47 is.
The Gunslinger
REad the Nat.Jrnl. article.A bit misleading re:Vendantam Wash.Post.Heard interview with him on NPR radio (gasp!)where Vendantam talked more on misinformation-then-correction study.When correction was shown,conservatives'percentage went back to original perception of issues,while liberals...not so much.The Hardheads,in other words,refused to admit they were wrong in original suppositions.(Hope I put that right).Not suprised...
ReplyDelete