Monday, June 30, 2008

What We Have Here, Is a Failure to Communicate

A reader's comment on the foregoing post reflects some basic misunderstandings between Wiccans and Christians that I really feel the need to address:

"Very interesting...As a teen nerd, I checked out Crowley, et al, briefly, realized it was about power, self-pity, and vanity---in other words, Evil. Wicca seems to be to me the "Episcopalian" (or Unitarian) form of Satanism (hope I stated that right). Animism is attractive to immature minds, but it inevitably leads to de-valuing of human life."

Aleister Crowley:
First, let me say there is no Crowley "et al". There is just Crowley... and everybody else. He is one of a kind. For Aleister Crowley it was always "all about him". To judge the occult by Crowley is like judging medicine by the physician/torturers at the Nazi camps.

He was a disturbed man, a drug addict, a sex addict (if I guess correctly), a media whore. He revolted against superiors, he dissed his mentors, he cast out on his own on a tide of crass and self-propelled publicity. He is hardly the wise man of Magic that most practitioners emulate.

He openly and publicly called himself the Great Beast, and used 666 as his sign. But, even at that, he was not worshipping Satan. Crowley didn't believe in "the Devil"...which is entirely a Christian concept.

But he did know how such a name and number would play in the press of the Christian west, and how much attention he would receive because of it among the foolish and the idle who were attracted to anything they thought of as "wicked". I'm sure such attention was very flattering to his vanity—and his bank account.

Having once been a member of the Order of the Golden Dawn, whose goals, like all legitimate religious/spiritual orders was enlightenment and communion with the divine, he left, and strayed from the True Path, and paid the price. His very life is a warning to us all.

The reader's perception of him is entirely correct. He errs, however, in assuming that legitimate students of the Occult or practitioners of Magic are remotely like this sorry, damaged, needy man.

And finally, Crowley has nothing whatever to do with Wicca.


Satanism:
I am frankly more than a little surprised that anyone would equate Wicca with Satanism! Wiccans don't believe in "the Devil" either. Their religion does not use any Christian symbolism, demons or deities. Like Buddhism or Hinduism, it is uniquely its own belief system. There are thousands of books on the subject of Wicca, by Wiccans. You will not find "devil worship" in a single one.

(Indeed, the original sources equating Witchcraft to Devil Worship were homicidal Christian zealots who de-valued human life in the extreme—and did a swift and profitable business identifying and murdering so-called witches, and confiscating their property for their own purses.)

Wicca is a supremely lovely, loving religion...albeit populated by many silly people who refuse to acknowledge that evil exists at all. It's greatest attraction, and one that I find most delightful is the supremacy of the Divine Female. Frankly, after centuries of women being inferior creatures in our own churches, in thrall to all things male, it's high time for the elevation of the eternal, divine feminine. That sometimes, in some adherents, this results in squishy, frothy emotionalism does not diminish the power or glory of the Goddess, or her rightful place as the Queen of Heaven, our Divine Mother.

You may not subscribe to this splendid image, but it is certainly no less true, or more foolish that any idea of the divine masculine, King of Heaven, our Divine Father.

Indeed most Wiccans believe in a Divine Couple. The God and the Goddess...which makes a great deal more practical sense that either one alone.

"...in their likeness, male and female they created them." Remember "Elohim" of Genesis has a plural ending.

This is hardly Satanism. Only a Christian can worship Satan—the King demon incarnate. He's the only one that believes he actually exists. Satan is a Christian myth...a Christian deity, if you will. I don't think he appears anywhere in the Old Testament. (Lucifer, the light-bringer, who is not at all the same personage—despite the common misunderstanding—is more analogous to Prometheus than to any sort of demon. In the myth, Prometheus too was condemned to eternal punishment for bringing fire (en-LIGHTen-ment?) to mankind!)

Animism:
Animism, the attribution of individual living souls to plants, inanimate objects and natural phenomena, is a very primitive notion, not be confused with the Divine Immanence of Wicca, which is the idea that all creation has the Goddess "indwelling", as it proceeded from the Divine Center; flowed, as it were, into time/space to become the material world. This has much in common with Buddhism and Taoism. In much the same way that everything IS the Tao, or has a "Buddha-nature", it has a "Goddess-Nature".

The universe can symbolically be said to the the "body" or "divine child"of the Goddess, as it flowed directly from her essence; it was not created as a willful act of separateness, as in the Christian/Judeo myth. Human beings, being particularly evolved with higher consciousness, through whom the Universe becomes aware of itself on the material plane, as part of, or direct children of, the Goddess herself, cannot be "de-valued".

Christians believe that each unique soul has but one life. Once chance. One test. And upon it eternity depends. I think they are therefore much more likely to deny the flesh in anticipation of the reward of Heaven. I think that anyone who holds such a belief is much more likely to have disdain for earthly human life than those who believe that their bodies, their lives, and those of all around them, are the very life of the divine.

The Gunslinger*

*Who is NOT a Wiccan.

12 comments:

  1. Ever read up Wotanism, GS? You might like it.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Great post, well said.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I never would've expected to see any discussion like this here given some on Christianity in the past :)

    If I recall correctly pre-Abrahamic Semitic religions also recognized the the Great Mother spirit along with the Great Father and their other Gods.

    Anyway, as an agnostic the study of religion provides the most saturated account of understanding humanity and its beauty. (Pretty sure a supreme being exists - even if it's as cold as Brahman. God sure didn't make it easy to know Him anyway!)

    ReplyDelete
  5. Adam, I cleave to the 9 Asatru virtues. And totally approve of Valhalla, a special place for brave warriors. I'm a little depressed by the idea of Ragnarok, though. I have a little trouble translating the literal to the spiritual in Wotanism for some reason.

    Thanks, jd.

    Jag, I am not a Christian. But I am a "defender of the faith" in that I understand that much of what is great in the West has come from principles and virtues found only in Christianity. Its strong materialism blended with spirituality was magic for the evolution of philosophy and culture. And we have, under its auspices, created the most advanced, most compassionate, richest, most powerful, most free, most respectful of the individual culture in the history of the world.

    At the same time, the Christian myth itself and the doctrine that supports it do not satisfy my imagination, intellect or soul. So I am still a seeker investigating different spiritual paths.

    The one thing I do believe is that all righteous paths lead to the same God...notwithstanding the insistence of some that theirs is the one and only true faith.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Thought I read somewhere that after Ragnarok and the death of the gods, Midgard would be re-made, clean, pure, and strong. Or did I read wrong?

    ReplyDelete
  7. Wow!"Failure to communicate"indeed-on my part."To judge Crowley.."-isn't that the same as judging Christianity by the twisted prejudicial actions and dogma-wars of The Church/other churches? I was just going from personal,albeit limited experiences with Wiccans,all of whom unfortunately were those who were,as you said, "silly people who deny evil exists at all"(one can imagine my ire at these Vandy hippies,after living in NYC!).So I did the same-judging a creed by the flakiness of those who claim to practice it.Scholarship has its uses,but it's all down to depending on the written WORD,which only goes so far in describing Life's, er,magic,if you will.If I recall, "Sha-tan"(?) was Hebraic definition of the force that blocks one from The Creator.I can see and understand "indwelling",etc.but find it entertaining that it has to be "Goddess" vs. "God,the Father".Guess it was just the Wiccans I've met,but 3/4 were women,so of course that appeals to them.My personal view is that the Creator/Universal Mind/whatever is beyond the gender-thing,and any tags of gender for myth-making are human projections of personal and cultural prejudices.My own prejudice is against group-think of any kind.In the end,we're all just squirrels looking for a nut,whatever label we give it.

    ReplyDelete
  8. TJ...Point taken, but my point is, Crowley is NOT REPRESENTATIVE of the "pagan" community. He's a freakish, self-serving, publicity hound that uses the occult for basicaly satisfying his animal appetites.

    Or at least, that's what he's best known for. It is certainly his public persona. That would be like judging the Catholic Religion itself on the recent priest sex scandals.

    They may be VERY bad, but they do not define the entirety of the Church.

    My point is no matter what Crowley he does not define the Occult, or paganism, much as he would like to.

    Yes, Wicca is often taken literally by its adherents. I believe it is because most of them grew up taking Christian myths literally. They merely switched the focus to another deity, but didn't rethink the fundamental question of myth vs history.

    I think, nevertheless, that the worship of a Goddess is a good intermediate step to the understanding that "god" is beyond gender.

    Since many Christian churches, the Catholic Church included, base many of their fundamental doctrines on the sex of God/Jesus. The Goddess worshippers are rebelling against that. I applaud it.

    If you've not been told to your face that you are not worthy to be a priest because you don't have a penis...perhaps it's a little harder to understand the attraction of a female-centric religion.

    So, as for Wicca appealing to women....DUH! Women invented it, precisely as a antidote to the prevailing men's club.

    But the REAL problem is that most Wiccans are LIBERALS. So they are, by definition, idiots...and I get your point completely.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Adam, you got it right...Balder, the beloved god, who is killed by the treachery of Loki, will rise again and rule the new world.

    That's good and all, but the loss of Odin and Thor and all the rest who are doomed to be killed in the conflagration with chaos just kinda bums me out.

    They're just so...cool.

    ReplyDelete
  10. LIBERALS ... are, by definition, idiots

    Hey I resemble that remark!

    Seriously though, Christianity's role in the propagation of Western Virtue is something I've learned a bit about on your blog.

    ReplyDelete
  11. But if Balder can rise again, why not the others?

    ReplyDelete
  12. Jag...You know I use "liberals" as shorthand for the extreme Leftie idiots. Besides, this is a Right Winger blog...you gotta expect that kind of stuff...right??

    Adam...Balder is supposed to take the place of the Old Gods, I think. He's a sort of Christ-like figure, as opposed to the one-handed, one-eyed, hammer throwing, spear chucking, sword wielding, giant-killing, thunder-making, bloodthirsty, human sacrificing, Valhalla types.

    He's all about peace and plenty and love and joy and springtime and that sort of thing.

    As I understand it, the Old Gods exist to fight Chaos in its various forms. Once it is defeated, they are no longer necessary. I gather they would be something of a liability in the sort of "new age" aftermath.

    It's an old story. Society needs and honors fierce warriors only as long as it needs them to die for it, but finds them difficult to assimilate and embarrassing once Peace breaks out.

    I like the Old Gods, though Odin, at least, does have a reputation as a master manipulator, who has been known to abandon his favorites at very inopportune times...according to legend.

    ReplyDelete