Poor Jews or Evil Jews? Or Something In Between?

I have been doing a lot of reading and thinking about some very politically incorrect notions. Indeed, they are worse than that, they are in some countries, illegal ideas. Among others they are automatically called "hate".

I'm interested in them because they are the stumbling blocks for me to comfortably and morally associate with groups and people who hold other beliefs that I mostly share.

I am not bothered by being called a "racist" because I believe that every race has a right to their own homeland, even Caucasians. I'm not bothered by being considered a "bigot" because I accept as true the fact that there are actual and measurable differences between races. I don't mind being thought of as evil because I believe that multi-racial societies almost always have racial strife...and that the more races are separated, the happier each are.

But...I do worry about being anti-Semitic. Because I have always considered the Jews to be an innocent persecuted minority whose entire history has been one of inexplicable difficulty, unfair ostracism and undeserved cruelty.

Thus, I found it very disturbing to find that so many of the people who believe as I do about Race, are what can only be described as anti-Semitic.

Now, the people I am talking about are often highly educated, well-read, reasonable, honest, moral, literate and sincerely believe that the separation of the races is not about doing evil to others for the benefit of Whites...but is in fact better for all races, making peace and harmony both within and between races more likely.

So, it seemed odd that in association with this enlightened assessment of our racial problems, they, almost to a man, hold the Jews guilty of crimes against our race and our culture.

If I had found these people to be a hysterical, stereotypical "nigger-hating" lynch mob, I would not have wasted a moment wondering why they "hated" Jews. I would have just dismissed them as idiots and moved on.

But they're anything but hateful. Oh, they're angry, for sure...and for cause.

So I decided to investigate just what it was they were saying about the Jews, and what their beef was. It was hard to approach it with an "open" mind. The very idea of it pretty much offended me down to my pantyhose.

I've only come to a couple of interim conclusions, subject to revision as I get more information.

The argument against the Jews is basically this: They move into a host nation, behave in ways that are good for Jews at the expense of the host population, do not assimilate, remain a group apart, behave and think tribally, and have no compunction in doing whatever it takes to gain personal and group advantage, no matter what damage they do to their hosts or to other peoples.

Due to their undoubted intelligence and work ethic, they rise to the top of many professions, and use their positions of influence to further the above goals. Finance, commerce, and art are typical areas of success and influence.

No matter where, no matter when, and no matter the specifics, this is always at bottom, the general charge and the cause of resentment.

When a society becomes aware of the undue influence, or manipulation, or suffers damage from such practises, it eventually retaliates against the offenders...and another "persecution" of the Jews commences.

Now, this is my own generalization, based on what I have read. Many of the "racists" who are also "anti-semitic" are only aware of what they see as the damage and undue influence Jews are wielding in America and the West today. They see policies that are inimical to our culture, our way of life, our unity and cohesion. They see that many of these paths were blazed by Jews. And they resent that the result of them is the dissolution of our racial and cultural homogeneity.

The next logical step is to try to figure out if this is true. Do Jews do this?

I'm not a historian, so I cannot, on my own authority, verify or disprove specific charges made regarding the historical behavior of Jewish people. But there are a few indicators that turn out to be interesting, and perhaps telling.

There is a list, provided by a Jewish website of the history of Jewish "persecution". It is presented there clearly to show that they are perpetual victims, and that everyone of conscience should prevent it from ever happening again.

But there is another way to look at this list:

Or one might ask, "Why have so many various and different groups of people, after living with Jews, found them so objectionable that they either took arms against them, or expelled them from their countries?

Has this happened, perpetually and repeatedly throughout ALL of known history to any other group of people?

If I heard about a group of guys that get thrown out of every bar they hang out in would I automatically assume that every bar owners is "persecuting" the group? Or is it more likely that these guys are repeatedly doing something that pisses off bar owners?

Even if their protestations of innocence do seem convincing, doesn't the overwhelming number of incidents create a pattern that cannot be ignored?

And being aware of this pattern, as a bar owner, would you prefer to keep these guys out of your place? Would you be a "bigot" if you did?

An interesting conundrum proponents of what is called anti-Semitism find themselves in, is that they always argue that ONLY that which they disagree with or oppose is the fault of the Jews. Now this makes their arguments vulnerable...as it should...when evidence of Jews acting in apparently opposing ways is discovered.

The Far Right is up in arms because the Jews are responsible in part for the mixing of the races, via their vital role in the Civil Rights movement, and the destruction of the family via their promotion of abortion rights, feminism; and their glorification of secularism and all the Liberal degeneracy that the Far Right hates. The Far Right "Hates" the Jews for Promoting Liberalism.

The Far Left is up in arms because Neo-Conservative Jews are responsible for the Muslims hatred of us because of our intractable support of Israel; are responsible for the War in which American sons are fighting the Zionist war against Afghanistan, Iraq...and as they see it, soon, Iran. They are furious that we are paying billions of dollars in aid to Israel, that evil aggressor and usurper of the Middle East. The Far Left "Hates" the Jews for Promotion Neo-Conservatism.

Now...they can't both be right, can they?

The question, of course, assumes the Jews must be on one side or the other. But suppose they're are not on the Conservative Side or the Liberal Side, but on their own side. Isn't it possible that promoting multicultural and "tolerant" ideas, and promoting war with Israel's enemies are perfectly consistent from the Jewish point of view?

As for the sincerity of the Left and Right, think how unlikely, if they were just arbitrarily choosing a "convenient scapegoat" for their complaints, that they would choose a common enemy. It's not like there is a shortage of groups to choose from in this political environment.

The two camps don't agree on the color of the sky. That they would voluntarily choose the same "bad guys" is unthinkable, unless they really believed in it.

Now, obviously, "believing in it" doesn't make it true. But, again, here is this pattern continued, in which the Jews are the common denominator: Opposing sides, with nothing in common, indeed, with much animosity, find themselves, surely against their preference, identifying a common enemy.

At what point do we stop automatically assuming that Jews are always the innocent victims of everyone else's mindless wrath? What in the make up of human beings of all races, colors, creeds, cultures, levels of civilizations, historical eras and geographical locations prompts them to choose the Jews to pick on?

All I can say is, there's more to this than meets the eye. There's something going on here.

And for now, that's as far as I've gotten.

The Gunslinger