Saturday, November 15, 2008

You Asked for it, America!

Warnings of big terrorist attack

Cube and Venezuela to host Russian Prez

China shows interest in Latin America

Hamas fires barrage of missiles into Israel as Ceasefire unravels.


Mexican Drug gangs invade U.S.

Here it comes. And when all the shit comes down, we'll have an Affirmative Action Figure* in the White House.

Oh and the Left's buddy Chavez is about to "detain" his political rival on "corruption" charges.

(How long before that particular tactic is imported too?)

God Bless Us Every One.

The Gunslinger

*credit: tjones

9 comments:

  1. Last paragraph of article re:Russia to hold joint naval military exercises with Venezuela.Prelude to Cold War repeats to come? And now that Russia's getting closer to Cuba,does that mean Raoul can get out of the cocaine business? Maybe he's been out of it,but he had to get in when the Soviets cut off aid in the late 80s.Why is the song "The Second Time Around" going thru my head?

    ReplyDelete
  2. p.s.-"Conservative Arguments" great addition to the page.You have some lovely nuggets in blogs further in the past that could be high-lighted as well,if you wish.Prescience from the past!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Gotta love it.

    The point remains, How do we turn this to our advantage?

    The Russian presence doesn't worry me. They're not preaching revolution anymore. Medvedev will do what is in the best economic interests of Russia and only that. He doesn't care about any of this social justice and equality nonsense. That, makes him trustworthy. You can predict what he will do. We should turn this to our advantage.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Good points.Not withstanding my own personal affection for Russians I met over the years,and once being married to a Serbian/Irish...well,"force-of- nature" is the best definition.Anyhoo,"Anonymous" is correct,except perhaps in "trustworthy" aspect.That is,tho I do think we and the Russians are more alike than we and the "Continentals" (perhaps a gangsta/fuck-the-aristocrats/yep,I'm-a-cockaroach-"Scarface"-thing)...we just caught the better breaks of History re:Revolutions (so far,anyway).Besides/because of personal affinities/history/predicative behavior...better "Them", than those Islamo-Creeps,who love to sacrifice their own children---how SICK is that? Assholes in US media take a cowardly stance on "Christian Fundamentalists" who object to party-whores aborting the results of self-indulgent behavior,but don't have the resolve to fight Muslim "honor-killings"...Kind of like Gandhi's cowardice in fighting the Nazis (which he didn't),only to wait til Brits re-gained power in India,because he knew he could shame them,and wouldn't gotten killed like he would've by the Nazis."Orwell" observed how pacifists never really put their lives on the line when it really mattered....

    ReplyDelete
  5. I should clarify. I didn't mean trustworthy in the sense of "doing the right thing". I meant trustworthy in the sense of "You can trust them to logically act in their best interests". This is contrary to progressives who act on whatever impulse flashes through their brain at the moment.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I get it. You can trust a greedy man...to be greedy. When you know what a man's motivation is, you can predict his actions.

    "Trust" is a loose term here hehe.

    ReplyDelete
  7. tj...I always love it when pacificts bring up Ghandi and King.

    I always point out that they were protesting against "civilized" peoples with consciences and good souls.

    If they'd tried that with Hitler, Mao or Stalin they would have been grease-stains on the road at the first "sit-in"

    Usually shuts them up.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Re:Rosales...I've seen some comments on other blogpages calling for basically the same to be done to Bush (i.e.,"put him and Cheney on trial when Obama takes the oath...").Gives new meaning to the phrase "Ugly Americans".52% of the vote is NOT a mandate (know several Demo asses who,in the end didn't bother to vote against Obama tho they hate his unctiousness,and as far as I'm concerned,bear more responsibility for possible up-coming shitstorm than anyone."For Evil to succeed...".I'll have hollow satisfaction in telling them when they gripe,"well,you helped bring it on,Dumbass".Same for dipsticks for whom McCain wasn't "conservative enough" for them.Politics is about choosing the least-damaging Candidate,sometimes...Hope both groups of idiots will be happy with themselves...at the least,Palin woulda been better back-up than...BIDEN? Are you kidding me?

    ReplyDelete
  9. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete