This short essay will address the first: LIFE.
God gives man life. Each man's life is his own, a gift from the Creator that no other man has the right to take.
This is so obvious it might seem silly to say it. But there is a necessary element in this argument that is under assault everywhere in our country that will undermine the very "right to life" of humans: the existence of God. It is under vicious attack by Atheistic "Humanists".
"Humanists" deny God’s existence. Every American atheist was brought up in a Christian country, in which he learned everything he knows about morality. He learned Christian morals by default. It is the moral code that underpins our entire culture, its traditions, and its laws. And having been immersed in Christian morality his entire life, his entire notion of good and evil is informed by the Christian moral code.
But, having decided to deny God, he also rejects Christianity.
But he doesn’t rethink or reinvent his morality. He believes he is a good person, and he calls his moral code: Humanism.
In other words, he rejects Christianity, but because he knows no other, retains Christian morality, but renames it “Humanism”.
Then he compares the clone called "Humanism" with the original, Christianity, and lo! he discovers that his "Humanism" has developed the identical moral code as Christianity. He therefore concludes that God need not exist for people to be moral, nor is religious “superstition” necessary!
As obvious as this is, our "Humanist" doesn't understand what he's just done. He's a Liberal; not a thinker. He doesn't realize that atheism could never arrive at the same moral code as Christianity. Christian morality is based on the existence and belief in God. He's not thought through what an atheist “moral code” would be.
He has not considered that with his idea of man’s brain, his clever, accidental machine that is not the creation of a God of compassion, justice, or reason—might have no access to or understanding of, the concepts of compassion, justice or reason.
Worse, our "Humanist" refuses to follow his own logic. He wants a "moral code" that allows him to do whatever he wants, without consequences, but fails to realize it also authorizes others to do whatever they want to him, without consequences.
The unalienable Right to Life can only exist as a right if endowed by a Creator.
Abortion, so beloved and defended by "Humanists" proves the argument irrefutably: The minute they got rid of God, "Humanists" started murdering babies.
As their “moral code” evolves away from its Christian matrix, we get a glimpse of what a it looks like. The moment they stopped considering a new life as a gift from God, they saw no reason not to kill it if it's “inconvenient”.
Their pretense that "Humanism" results in a moral code equal to Christianity’s is betrayed by the very first thing they embraced once they got ride of God: The Murder of the Inconvenient.
So far it’s just babies in the womb. Who’s next?