"Obama was not an editor of Harvard Law Review, but an elected president, which is another thing altogether, social, rather than intellectually rigorous."
Does anybody know anything about this? If it's true, all the fawning over Him because of the position is nonsense, and the Fringe Media who should—and no doubt DO—know better have collaborated in perpetrating a fraud. Okay that's not exactly news...but it would be nice to bust them....again.
Am I just behind the times? Has this already been brought up? Accepted? Debunked? Is it just another internet junk "factoid"?
It certainly would explain why there is no record of published articles in said Review by Maobama.
The Gunslinger, EOTIS