Do certain races have sovereignty over certain geographical areas?
Does Africa rightfully belong to Africans? Does the Middle East righfully belong to Arabs (and Persians)? Does China rightfully belong to the Chinese? Does the Philippines rightfully belong to the Filipinos?
If so, does Europe rightfully belong to Europeans?
In order to be philosophically and morally consistent, surely any rights accorded to Africans with regard to Africa and Chinese with regard to China, must be accorded to Europeans with regard to Europe.
If the idea of keeping China Chinese and Africa African is not morally offensive, why should the idea of keeping Europe European be morally offensive?
Assuming that races have staked out different parts of the world, do they have a right to do what is necessary to ensure continued existence?
Is a race morally justified in defending itself and assuring it's survival?
If one race's survival depends on the removal of another race, can it be morally justified? If the only options are ethnic cleansing or racial extinction, what is the moral choice?
Once a race has allowed a situation to become out of control, to its detriment, what is it morally justified in doing to reverse the situation?
Does morality require passive racial suicide, or allow aggressive racial defense?
Does the imminent death of one's race provide the same justification as the imminent death of one's self for lethal defensive measures?
Watching the changing demographics in Europe and America, these questions are urgent and practical, not theoretical and abstract.
If things keep going as they are, I believe that serious racial strife in America and Europe is inevitable. We'd better pre-determine what is moral and justified before we find ourselves in a pitched battle for survival, in which "final solutions" that appeal to hot blood and rage are again loosed on the world.
If we don't stop the flood of non-white Third Worlders into America and Europe...Tribal White Man will be awakened. And he is a very scary dude.
Skinheads and Nazis and the Klan are not aberrations. They are manifestations of latent potential in civilized White Man. For many decades, the West has been so tolerant, guilt-ridden, politically correct, self-limiting, and appeasing, that others may imagine that we are actually weak, impotent, ineffectual, and incapable of defending ourselves.
This is a dangerous error. Our gentleness, humility and compassion are the result of our clear, if unacknowledged, sense of cultural, economic, and military superiority. Like any blessed elite, we can afford to be gracious; and we see it as our duty to be.
But pushed too far, threatened with extinction or ruin or conquest, such trappings will fall away revealing the Beast Within.
The world has seen glimpses of it in the French Terror, German Nazism, and the Spanish Inquisition.
We are smart, organized, cooperative, disciplined, rich, inventive, brave, cruel and terrible. Please, please, don't piss us off.
The Gunslinger
Joebama American citizens 2024 print
10 months ago
Oh, you mean against Alexander the Great, Hannibal, Charlemagne, the several Ceasars, Napoleon, Leonides, King Henry V, and Winston Churchill?
ReplyDeleteNever mind Aloph Hilter, Joseph Stalin or Benito Mussolini.(Not nice, but definitely white and definitely effective warriors.)
...and Oppenheimer...
Your "warriors" can throw human skulls against the nuclear fire storm while howling Aztec voodoo. Good luck with that.
Do I need to mention the inability of Mexicans to get rid of a few drug lords who are destabilizing your country? You might want to take care of that first before you try to conquer the world, dude.
You do not instill a great deal of fear. Name-calling is easy. And your not even very creative at that.