A Dilemma with Horns

...and I'm on them.

I'm having a Moral Crisis...in that I can't decide the moral course to take. Here's my problem:

Is White Separatism morally obligatory, morally justifiable, morally neutral, or morally repugnant? Is it necessary? Is it desirable?

There seem to be reasonable arguments for all positions. And I am unable at present, to determine which arguments trump the others.

I have certain feelings about the subject. But I can't trust those. Feeling good about a position is not sufficient. It must Be Good. But how can I determine which of these positions is the right one?

The idea of White Separatism is a relatively new one for me. I grew up in a White World, and was taught that all people are equal, and that no race was superior to another. Racism, whether in the form of hostility or condescension was not tolerated. I believed it.

I believed it all my life. I might still decide to believe it. But I'm not so sure anymore. Evidence and experience argues against it.

In my personal life, I still live in a White World. All my friends are White, my place of employment is almost entirely White. The town I live in is still marginally majority White. I engage in activities that largely attract Whites.

But the landscape of my environment is vastly changed. "Press One for English" is the norm. Spanish and Mexicans are everywhere. Chinese and Filipinos have literally taken over several towns in the San Francisco Bay Area. Areas that were once White neighborhoods are now peopled with foreigners who speak foreign languages, celebrate foreign cultures.

Where did my country go? I don't like this. I don't like this at all.

Where are the German, Italian, Polish, Swiss, Swedish, Norwegian, French, English, Australian, Irish, Scottish immigrants? Why are they all brown and yellow with alien cultures that don't share the basic fundamental assumptions of mine?

Why is my country importing people that aren't White to the point that White people will be a minority soon? Why is my government giving my land, my country, my inheritance, my homeland away? Why is my government going out of its way to be sure that White people are outnumbered in "their own country"...so that soon, and obviously, it will no longer be "their own country"?

On the other hand, does "Whiteness" matter? Is it just an accident or surface diversity of pigment? Is there a fundamental difference in races? If there is, should we acknowledge it? Does is matter? Is it wiser and more moral to notice differences and act on them, or to pretend they don't exist, for the happiness and comfort of all?

People ARE people, after all. And their human dignity, no matter their color, must be respected. But is pretense required to accomplish that? Or is pretense the destroyer of dignity? If there is a fundamental difference among races, is it kindness or cruelty to pretend otherwise? Is it kindness or cruelty to acknowledge it, and deal with it?

If races do differ in innate characteristics, talents, intelligence and potential, is it fair or moral to those races who cannot meet the standards or accomplishments of others to demand or expect it of them? Is it fair to those whose cultures are high, to be swamped and degraded by those whose cultures are not?

Culture is not at issue here, really. I am clear that different culture cannot co-exist in the same nation. That has been demonstrated without serious argument, as a recipe for disaster.

It is as clear everywhere that culturally unassimilated immigrants create conflict, anger, resentment, even violence within countries; that order and community and freedom and human dignity and justice and even the economy are weakened.

For the United States to survive, foreign immigrants MUST assimilate into our culture. The Multiculturalists are wrong...deadly wrong...dangerously wrong. And we must resist them at every turn. Of this there is no doubt.

The question is no longer whether can cultures co-exist, but rather: Is race a determinate of culture?

Christianity and other high Spiritual systems tell us that all men are the same, equally beloved by God or emanations of the same Divine Spirit. These are powerful arguments against the idea that race should separate us. If we are all equally the Children of God, or essentially the same Spirit beneath our material forms, how can we distinguish between races? Why does race matter? Why should one seek to perpetuate one's own?

Assuming that we rate cultures, and that we determine Western Culture is the best...does it matter who perpetuates it? If all Whites disappeared, but all the resulting Cafe-au-Lait colored people cherished and advanced Western Civilization, would race matter?

On the other hand, is it possible for Western Civilization to survive White People's demise?

We are the inventors and builders of it. No other race developed anything like it. Africans and Arabs persist in primitive tribal collectives to this day. Asians seem to naturally develop totalitarian regimes with submissive, obedient, compliant, conformist subjects. Even after the profound influence of America in Japan after WWII, the Japanese culture remains highly conformist and non-individualistic. Western hemisphere "indian" populations are all still awash in poverty, ignorance and corruption.

Who among them can keep the light of Western Civilization shining in the world? Who among the races that did not naturally develop anything like it, can undertake to preserve it faithfully and truly and advance it appropriately?

In my head I see the children of Road Warrior...repeating snippets of the Great Civilization, in mangled words, without understanding, among its ruins.

So, what is the answer? Is preserving the White Race an important mission? Is it false pride, parochial interest, arrogance? Is it really just "tribal" too?

Or is it almost a sacred duty, not only for the survival of the Race...but literally for the hope and advancement of the entire World?

If that is so, perhaps the way to "frame" the mission is just that: The preservation of the White Race and its nations is a MUST for the advancement and improvement of all the other races.

Though others will find that argument painfully arrogant, it follows this If/Then logic:

IF races are fundamentally different, and culture is determined by race...

IF Western Civilization is the highest, best culture yet evolved by Man...

IF only the White Race developed, or COULD develop Western Civilization with its freedom, dignity and justice for all...

IF no race but the White Race could maintain and advance Western Civilization to ensure the preservation of these principles for all time, and eventually for all men...

THEN, it is a Sacred Duty for the hope of Mankind to see that the White Race and its superior civilization do not perish from the earth.

This is perfectly logical if all the IF's are true. And I suppose, finally, my question is: ARE ALL THE IF'S TRUE?

The Gunslinger