Friday, September 21, 2007

Steely Eyed Rifle Man

This is the way you deal with the slimy bastards. And I'm afraid the time is coming when we're going to have to do it, not only on the battlefields of foreign countries, but in our own streets. If the pixie-catching Progressives get much more power or influence, they'll do everything in their power to take us right down that road. Keep your powder dry.

The Gunslinger
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 11:57:06 -0500

Regarding the news blurb about the Marine who put two rounds ("double tap") in a wounded insurgent's head in Fallujah, here's a response from a Marine:

"It's a safety issue, pure and simple. After assaulting through a target, we put a security round
in everybody's head. Sorry al-Reuters, there's no paddy wagon rolling around Fallujah picking up "prisoners" and offering them a hot cup o' Joe, falafel, and a blanket.

There's no time to dick around on the target. You clear the space, dump the chumps, and move on. Are Corpsmen expected to treat wounded terrorists? Negative.

Hey Libs, worried about the defense budget? Well, it would be waste, fraud, and abuse for a Corpsman to expend one man-minute or a battle dressing on a terrorist. It's much cheaper to just spend the $.02 on a 5.56mm FMJ.

By the way, in our view, terrorists who chop off civilian's heads are not prisoners, they are carcasses. Chopping off a civilian's head is another reason why these idiots are known as "unlawful combatants." It seems that most of the world's journalists have forgotten that fact.

Let me be very clear about this issue. I have looked around the web, and many people get this concept, but there are some stragglers. Here is your typical Marine sitrep (situation report):

You just took fire from unlawful combatants (no uniform—breaking every Geneva Convention rule there is) shooting from a religious building, attempting to use the sanctuary status of their position as protection. But you're in Fallujah now, and the Marine Corps has decided that they're not playing that game this time. That was Najaf. So you set the mosque on fire and you hose down the terrorists with small arms, launch some AT-4s (Rockets), some 40MM grenades into the building and things quiet down.

So you run over there, and find some tangos (bad guys) wounded and pretending to be dead. You are aware that suicide martyrdom is like really popular with these idiots, and they think taking some Marines with them would be really cool. So you can risk your life and your fire team's lives by having them cover you while you bend down and search a guy that you think is pretending to be dead for some reason. Most of the time these are the guys with the grenade or a vest made of explosives. Also, you don't know who or what is in the next room. You're already speaking English to the rest of your fire team or squad, which lets the terrorist know you are there and you are his enemy. You are speaking loud because your hearing is poor from shooting people for several days. So you know that there are many other rooms to enter, and that if anyone is still alive in those rooms, they know that Americans are in the mosque. Meanwhile (3 seconds later), you still have this terrorist (that was just shooting at you from a mosque) playing possum. What do you do?

You double tap his head, and you go to the next room, that's what! What about the Geneva Convention and all that 'Law of Land Warfare' stuff? What about it? Without even addressing the issues at hand, your first thought should be, "I'd rather be judged by 12 than carried by 6."

Bear in mind that this tactic of double tapping a fallen terrorist is a perpetual mindset that is reinforced by experience on a minute by minute basis. Secondly, you are fighting an unlawful combatant in a Sanctuary, which is a double No-No on his part. Third, tactically you are in no position to take "prisoners" because there are more rooms to search and clear, and the behavior of said terrorist indicates that he is up to no good. No good in Fallujah is a very large place and the low end of no good and the high end of no good are fundamentally the same ... Marines end up getting hurt or die.

So there is no compelling reason for you to do anything but double tap this idiot and get on with the mission. If you are a veteran, then everything I have just written is self evident. If you are not a veteran, at least try to put yourself in the situation. Remember, in Fallujah there is no yesterday, there is no tomorrow, there is only now, Right NOW. Have you ever lived in NOW for a week? It is really, really not easy. If you have never lived in NOW for longer than it takes to finish the big roller coaster at Six Flags, then shut your mouth about putting Marines in jail for "War Crimes."

Semper fi.

2 comments:

  1. Oohrah, Marine. That's what I'm talking about.

    I blogged recently on this same subject from the law enforcement side. This young man did it a lot better, because I was still trying to be politically correct.

    So I hope you'll excuse me, Gunny, for getting on my little soapbox here at your blog, but my message to Americans - safe, free, clothed-warm-fed-and-sitting-on-your-comfy-couch Americans - is that the next time you want to second-guess the lawful acts of a soldier or law enforcement officer, think for a moment about the decisions you have to make in the course of a normal workday. Then, think about the decisions a soldier or police officer has to make in the course of a normal workday. Then, think about the conclusions you came to next time you think you know what it takes to protect you and your comfy couch.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Daughter--
    The idiots are so swamped in emotionalism, foggy logic and "feelings"...they can't THINK at all.

    They are mental children. It's all about THEM. The world literally revolves around their particular, pinhole perspective.

    I believe they are constitutionally incapable of putting themselves in another's situation.

    They may use the term "thinking outside the box". But they haven't got the slightest notion what that really entails. To them it means, "Opposing Conservatives".

    End of thought process.

    ReplyDelete