The visceral rage coming from incoherent muslims; the mindless,
wild destruction of life, culture, beauty, heritage, history, art...and
everything that human beings treasure and value, is what is so
attractive to the Left. They are, themselves, essentially, merchants of
death. And they recognize fellow-travelers.
This is not correct. The reason is slightly more complicated but entirely comprehensible and logical. I can't give that explanation now but will return with a post when time permits.
ReplyDeleteOf course it's correct. Or I wouldn't have said it. :p
ReplyDeleteLOL. Gunny, you are always right, except when you are wrong.
ReplyDeleteFirst, we must be absolutely clear that we understand the left is the ideology of elitism (socialism, Nazism, communism, islam). It is diametrically opposed to anything that rejects elitism. By application of leftist ideology, man is an accident of nature and some accidents are more beneficial than others. You as an accident which we judge to be beneficial to society shall be permitted to live while these other accidents that we judge not to be beneficial must be eradicated (Jews, Armenians, Christians, Gypsies, etc.). That is elitism's view of survival of the fittest.
According to the elite, somewhere in the world we can find the best of anything and we should all do what that best of anything tells us to do. Evolution made that person superior in that respect. The god of Christianity and Judaism is for weak minded people who were not gifted by an accident of nature to be superior. They are inferior and require a god to tell them what is right and wrong whereas we do not. With this foundation, it is easy to see that Islam is no different than Christianity in the eyes of the elitist.
What the left is saying is that what tolerance is given to Christianity should also be given to Islam. They will argue it is a religion, protected by the Constitution. Would they make the same argument for the Thugees?
This has nothing to do with reality but everything to do with the elitist conflict with Christianity. Tolerance of Islam is the "in your face" response of the left. It will eventually be reversed but it serves a useful purpose. That purpose is to cast all religion in the same light and then justify banning all religions. Hence the argument "we can't ban Islam" because it is no worse than Christianity. That is a leftist mantra and you can take that to the bank. They all say it in their little automatronic voices. It is indisputable to a leftists and they adopt such expressions as "same s**t, different toilet" and in their mind, that is the end of discussion.
Curiously enough, Islam does share many attributes with leftist elitism, but that is more coincidence and not the reason for leftist tolerance of Islam. Islam is elitists and asserts a superiority of its believers far above others who are not considered people at all. They are meant to be slaves, abused and ultimately eradicated. They are inferior.
Get it straight, the left DOES NOT ACCEPT ISLAM. It is tolerated as a counter force to Christianity. It is the left saying "you are no better than they are, so if we can tolerate you we can tolerate them." This has nothing to do with common and shared principals though there are many. The left is not into "Allah" and never will be. It is into "if we can tolerate the God of the bible, you must tolerate the god of the Koran and eventually we will ban them both."
That will change and I did peek ahead and saw another posting warning Muslims about leftist treachery. That will do no good and each will attempt to use the other, always in the belief that in the end, they will triumph. Islam and the left are both treacherous and deserve each other.
Islam is an expediency to elitist ambitions and nothing more. Elitist are compulsive liars because they believe you believing their lies proves they are superior. Never take anything the left says at face value.
OK, I went off on an intense rant but this subject annoys me greatly. Here's an example from an exchange I had with someone on Facebook:
ReplyDeleteIslam has some bad people but so does Christianity. Christians join the KKK but we don't ban Christianity, so therefore we can't ban Islam because a few become terrorist.
Can you see where this "no difference" argument leads? To the elite, anyone who believes in a deity is mentally defective regardless of which deity it is, so that also proves to the left there is no difference between religions since all are based on a mental defect.
Islam is then more proof that all religion is bad so if you are going to ban one, you must ban them all. Since the common people don't understand that yet, they must be led to understand that and it is they who will demand all religions be banned. Isn't that fair?
Reading it. Will get back.
ReplyDelete