Wednesday, November 18, 2009

The Real Question


WHY is Øbama bringing terrorists into the United States to civilian courts?

WHY is Øbama trying to get health care passed when it will add trillions to our debt?

WHY is Øbama (and the Fed) keeping interest rates low when it is destroying our dollar?

WHY is Øbama printing money so fast we have doubled the money supply?

WHY has Andy Stern of SEIU visited the White House 22 times since Øbama's inauguration?

WHY haven't the SEIU thugs that beat up and hospitalized Kenneth Gladney, 38, a conservative activist from St. Louis, been charged?

WHY is all the "stimulus" money being paid to government entities instead of the private sector?

WHY does Øbama have nothing but anti-American radicals in his administration?

WHY does Øbama say nothing but hackneyed bromides and platitudes?

WHY does Øbama want our electricity rates to "skyrocket"?

WHY is ACORN still in business?

WHY does the Chief of Staff of the Army, General Casey, believe that "diversity" is more important than the lives of U.S. Soldiers under his command?

WHY is he still the Chief of Staff of the Army?

WHY does Øbama refuse to do anything about Iran but talk?

WHY did Øbama sell out our Eastern European allies by trashing long range missile defense?

WHY doesn't Øbama cover his heart during the national anthem?

WHY does Øbama want to tax, fine and regulate small businesses—which are the job creators—during deep unemployment in the middle of a recession?

WHY does Øbama push policies and programs that a clear majority of Americans do not want?

WHY did Øbama start a feud with FOX News?

WHY does Øbama want amnesty for illegal aliens?

WHY does Øbama say "government is the solution"?

WHY does Øbama's "diversity czar" at the FCC admire Hugo Chavez's government takeover of the Media—and think that's what the Øbama Government should do?

WHY does Øbama bow to foreign royalty?

WHY does Øbama bow to foreign royalty, but not the Queen of England?

WHY does Øbama ramble about Indian affairs, greet people and give "shout-outs" when 13 American Soldiers have just been murdered in an act of war on American soil, by a Islamic terrorist?

WHY does Øbama leap to the conclusion that Cambridge police are stupid racists....but wants us to "reserve judgement" about a Muslim dirtbag who just slaughtered 13 people in front of hundreds of witness, while shouting "Allah Akbar" (or whatever the fuck it is)?

There's more...but I'm getting tired.

The Gunslinger, EOTIS
Para Bellum


  1. We think that todays administration under President Obama or previous political parties had a goal of enforcing our immigration laws. But corrupt politicians intervened on behalf of the open border fanatics and special interest lobbyists. As with E-Verify that has become a spotlighted enforcement law, because it was originally nearly tabled by Sen. Harry Reid (D-NV) and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA). But public uproar caused them to forcibly change their decisions and fully fund E-Verify for another 3 years. WITHOUT PUBLIC SUPPORT THEY WOULD NOT HAVE CAVED-IN? Right now it is the--ONLY--true enforcement tool implemented, but it is only as good--IF--business owners are forced to use it. Even though hundreds of thousands of companies have now decided to apply it, yet it is not MANDATORY? It is up to the discretion of employers? In a few states Representatives have introduced it into law, as with the fed's issuing an ultimatum that all contractors/subcontractors must use E-Verify.
    Justifiably bloggers should be either criticized for their anti-sovereignty stand, or praised for informing the unaware public of the taxpayers money needed to fund a 2009-2010 Comprehensive Immigration Reform. Rewarding the millions already illegally squatting here, with the costs to support families, children and those kin who will come here through sponsorship. THEN THE MILLIONS MORE WHO HAVE HEARD THE CALL FOR AMNESTY AND RUSH TO GET HERE FROM POOR NATIONS, BEFORE THE NEW LAW MATERIALIZES?

    House Judiciary Committee's Ranking Member Lamar Smith (R-Texas) wrote an op-ed for the Washington Times today He stated that the Washington Times had slammed the Obama Administration for hardened enforcement. While the opposite reaction came from the open border advocates saying there was too much enforcement. However Rep. Smith determined the opposite? This is his statement:-

  2. * Rescinding of the "no-match" rule that prevents the Social Security Administration from contacting employers when a new hires name and social security number don't match their records. "Without this protection, many employers will continue to employ individuals they know are illegal and are taking jobs that should go to citizens and legal residents," Smith said.
    * Repeal of REAL ID in lieu of PASS ID, which makes it easier for illegal aliens to obtain a driver's license. "This makes it easier for illegal immigrants to stay in the country. And it can provide terrorists with a legitimate ID - as we saw with the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorists, who between them obtained 30 driver's licenses and ID cards," Smith said.
    * Lack of funding for an airport biometric exit system that is part of a DHS proposal to monitor when foreign visitors leave the country. "40 percent of all 12 million to 20 million illegal immigrants in the United States entered the country legally but overstayed their visas. This program will show who did not leave the country when they should have," Smith said.
    * Restricted the 287(g) program by limiting the ways local law enforcement officials can help federal immigration enforcement officials.
    * No funding for border fence, which was required by the Secure Fence Act of 2006.
    * Signing the CHIP bill making it easier for illegal aliens to get health care.
    * Reduced work site enforcement by shifting the focus away from the illegal workers and onto the businesses that hire them.
    * Allow states to provide in-state tuition to illegal aliens even though it violate federal law.

    Reading the Washington Times indicates to me, that they are pro illegal immigration, that is not in the American workers interest. They have consistently reacted to any enforcement of laws. They are obviously adverse to any immigration restriction, as the majority of the national press have indicated to us. Unlike the rural media who do not condone DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano's rush to OVERPOPULATION through another BLANKET AMNESTY? Grade your Senator of Congressman/Woman on NUMBERSUSA website. Call them and reprimand them for approving another AMNESTY or anything else at 202-224-3121. The people of America have been blindsided to long and must become more involved. We all no by now we cannot trust our government anymore to do the right thing for all of us. To survive we must fight back or financially--SINK. Washington is truly a corrupt place, where taxpayers money is the bargaining chip. Read all at JUDICIAL WATCH, CAPSWEB, ALIPAC, AMERICAN PATROL & THE DARK SIDE OF ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION.

  3. All we need is one person with a good field of fire at the front door of the courthouse.

  4. Lots of good questions, fortunately just one answer answers them all: They are liars intent on forcing others to behave as if their lies were true.

    A simple antidote can be made from equal parts Questioning,
    Demanding answers,
    Laughing at their feeble answers,
    Demonstrating the Truth (which does require the additional step of learning them first - much sunlight can be found here),

    and most important of all... going out and doing that yourself, everywhere you go!