Monday, April 14, 2008

The Unholy Three

Are Liberals just stupid, or actually evil?

The reason I ask is that Liberal policies make every problem worse. I honestly can't think of one that hasn't.

South Africa and Rhodesia were prosperous, stable, modern states. Liberals demanded the removal of the White government in favor of Black Rule. Now both countries are descending into chaos, violence, corruption and poverty.

The Liberals "won" America's withdrawal from Vietnam for "peace". It resulted in the violent slaughter of millions of Cambodians and Vietnamese.

The Liberals insisted that poor blacks be supported and housed as part of the "War on Poverty". Welfare resulted in the destruction of the black family, the black community, generations of hopelessly dependent, under-class blacks and ghettos of "public housing" where blight, gangs, drugs and violence are a way of life.

The Liberals demanded that blacks be held to lower standards, lower test scores, lower requirements for jobs and college entry...so they could "compete" with whites. Affirmative Action resulted in resentment by displaced whites and the frustration and failure of blacks promoted beyond their competence.

The Liberals demanded that businesses pay unskilled workers a minimum wage. It resulted in unskilled people losing their jobs as employers struggled to cope with the higher cost of labor.

The Liberals demanded that tax rates be increased because the government needed more money. It resulted in lower revenue...less money actually collected in taxes by the State.

These liberal policies not only failed their stated objectives, they made every situation measurably worse. Yet Liberals refuse to acknowledge these actual consequences and continue to push the same failed agenda.

What the hell is going on here?

Are Liberals just stupid or actually evil? Is there another possibility? Are they mentally ill? Delusional? Are they mind-controlled by some unknown interplanetary power?

How can you watch your "solutions" produce disasters & catastrophes time and again, and never ever wonder whether your ideas are flawed? Can a fully functional adult human being, within the average bell curve of intelligence operate like that?

Obviously a fully functional, reasonably intelligent adult to whom results matter, could not watch their ideas produce calamity after calamity and not question them.

However, an intelligent human could operate like that if they don't care about consequences. But what can that mean? What other reason could they have for proposing and promoting their agenda if it isn't to do what they claim?

Now before I go any further, I want to give credit where credit is due, and admit that lots of Liberals are, in fact, merely stupid, and are unable to connect action with consequence...and therefore can continue to imagine, because their ideas seem good they do good.

John McCain fits into this category.

But I think it fair to say that there is some evidence that not all Liberals are cretins. Therefore, we have to come to some satisfactory explanation of their continuing to advocate policies that are destructive to the very people they claim to care about and to the very country they claim to love.

And that takes us to two distinct levels of Evil.

The first is: Greed & Ambition. These people have discovered that promising certain things and implementing certain policies, regardless of their efficacy, bring power, fame, privilege and wealth. They will change their politics and their policies depending on the mood of the constituency. They can be pro-war or anti-war as necessary. They can be pro-welfare or anti-welfare as required. They can be pro/anti Free Trade, Income Taxes, Business, Guns, God or Gambling as called for. The results of their policies are immaterial except insofar as they generate immediate and plentiful personal rewards for themselves.

That is certainly evil. And the more their Liberal policies do actual harm to actual people, cultures, communities and countries the worse it is. But its seat is the shallow, cheap evil of personal aggrandizement and monetary gain.

Bill and Hillary Clinton are good examples of this type.

While Satan delegates this low temptation to his flunkies, he takes a more personal interest in the second, deeper, darker level of evil, which entails doing purposefully what the Stupid do unintentionally, and the Greedy & Ambitious do tangentially.

This is harder to explain because from my perspective it's rather like the comic book villain that wants to "destroy the earth." The point of it all is vexedly unclear. And the motives are always melodramatic and megalomaniacal.

Someone who isn't Stupid can see the catastrophic consequences of Liberal policies throughout the decades. They can see the harm, pain, death, misery, starvation, poverty, dependence, hopelessness caused by them.

Someone who isn't blinded by Greed and Ambition doesn't have the cheap, low, animal drive to support anything, no matter how harmful, just to reap private material benefits in the here and now.

Someone who both sees the calamitous results of Liberal policies, and doesn't have the blinding primitive compulsion to use them for personal gain, yet still supports and promotes them is doing so mindful of their perfect record of failure to effect their stated goals, and their consistently devastating consequences for millions of people. He is calculated, reasoned, logical and determined to implement failed and harmful policies on his fellow man for some reason that only he can understand, or see to be necessary or right. The misery inflicted on millions of others is a price he's willing to pay to accomplish some greater goal, some higher good.

Because he knows better. He is the hand of destiny. He is the healer and messiah.

I think we know which candidate is Satan's special boy who is willing to destroy what he claims to love and sacrifice those he claims to represent in service of his dark, superior, exalted vision.

The Gunslinger

8 comments:

  1. 'How can you watch your "solutions" produce disasters & catastrophes time and again, and never ever wonder whether your ideas are flawed? Can a fully functional adult human being, within the average bell curve of intelligence operate like that?'

    Answer:
    Egotistical irresponsibility.

    Most of these policy makers are so stuck on themselves that they can't believe their noble ideas aren't producing the intended results. Therefore, it must be somebody else's fault.

    ReplyDelete
  2. GS - while some Liberal solutions may be ineffectual (I don't know much about tax revenue going down for example), some seem to be working:

    Poverty among African Americans has gone down 35% since the 60s (and poverty in general). I'm beginning to think this whole race debate is an illusion.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Not that I take anything form U.of Maryland seriously,but for the sake of doing just that,a question must be asked:WTF IS EVERYONE BITCHING ABOUT,THEN?Definitions of poverty have changed,people "feel" they are poor if they have 100 basic cable channels instead of several hundred.Where's the connection between "Liberal"solutions,and results,a solpsistic argument-to quote either WFB or George Will,it's like saying "Before Women got the vote there was no atomic bomb,now there is,therefore giving Women the Vote brought on the Atom bomb.Just like "FDR's policies brought the US out of the Depression"tho the unemployment rate barely changed-it took WW2 to bring the country out of the Depression.

    ReplyDelete
  4. tj - that's what I'm starting to wonder - "wtf is everyone bitching about?" I think social welfare is a good thing, just to get that out of the way.

    It's obviously only correlation; I would be interested to know if you have any data that shows welfare has hurt African Americans.

    That correlation is a bit more stark than women and the atomic bomb - there was never a vote about that (though I see your point).

    What's wrong with U of Maryland?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Jag:

    Welfare is the overriding cause of the breakdown of the black family. It is responsible for the epidemic of "fatherless" boys in the poorest black ghettos.

    It awarded irresponsible behavior for decades, awarded single motherhood, discouraged marriage.

    Personally, I think slavery did less damage. Why? Because in the direct aftermath of emancipation, blacks formed strong families and tight communities, and immediately began to improve their lot by their own effort, hard work, virtues, values and cooperation.

    It was not until the catastrophe of the War on Poverty that the black community began to completely deteriorate. A process that continues to this day...with over 70% of black children born out of wedlock, black urban schools graduating less than 25% of students, high black population cities among the most dangerous in the country: D.C., Detroit, Oakland, Richmond etc., an epidemic of homicide, drugs, gangs and crime, which results in more black men in jail than ever.

    It's a downward spiral that began in earnest with the Liberal Great Society.

    ReplyDelete
  6. "What's wrong with U of MD?'I admit to prejudice from watching C-SPAN and seeing the ineptitude of Congress members from there who can barely read what speech is put before them.I extrapolated from that observation (and other readings) that Maryland state government and institutions of full of incompetents who couldn't get a real job.To paraphrase Mark Twain over 100 yrs.ago,"Suppose you're an idiot.Suppose you're in Congress...but,gentlemen,I repeat myself..."

    ReplyDelete
  7. By the way GS,great reply;could not have said it better myself,so I won't.Except:it's as obvious a fact as the sunrise,and I have too many Black friends who are refugees from those urban areas who moved to Nashville to get away from their nightmare.We have problems here just starting,but we're "20 yrs. behind the times",so it's not as bad yet.When I lived in NYC,every fellow Southerner I met who was Black told me "What the Hell is wrong with the brothers up here?They're fucked up in their heads"

    ReplyDelete
  8. The whole racial "gimme" thing is SO out of control!

    The only thing good about the Obie candidacy, is it's exposing it...right on the front page, even as Big Media tries it's best to minimize and dilute it.

    ReplyDelete