The Left's Favorite Wars

Here's the horrible story about Burma.

Here's the front page commentary at Lefty haven Buzzflash:

"Thousands dead in massacre of the monks dumped in the jungle. Bush does nothing to "liberate" the Burmese being tortured and killed as they merely demonstrate for democracy. He just reads meaningless words of support. Meanwhile, he wastes hundreds of billions of our dollars on a civil war in Iraq."

Typical Moonbat logic:

We HATE the war Bush is fighting, but we LOVE the war Bush isn't fighting--until he starts fighting it---then we HATE it .

PEACE is the answer, unless Bush is being peaceful.

WAR never solves anything unless Bush is not conducting war; then WAR is the answer; until he makes WAR, and then only PEACE is the answer.

And these people cannot figure out why we laugh at them!

But this incoherency gave me an idea: What if the Liberals started their own Army? George Soros' billions ought to be enough. All the infuriated, aggressive, loony, threatening, bully-boys who want to "take it to the streets" could join, and go fight the wars they think George Bush OUGHT to be fighting but isn't.

I mean, if it so important to them to Free Tibet, Save Burma, Defend Dafur, Protect Haiti...why don't they get off their asses and do it? Granted, given that they are undisciplined self-indulgent, addicted to instant gratification, immature, dishonorable, without integrity, cowardly, ignorant of history and almost universally stupid, they'd make a pretty poor army, but they don't seem to know that. Call it Soros' Raiders—a sort of French Foreign Legion in "V for Vendetta" masks...a mighty force of Mercenary Moonbats riding to the rescue of oppressed people the world over.

The could use hot air ballons...small carbon footprint. They could wear hemp.

Now, here's the part I really like. Sooner or later, they'll end up on the wrong side of a war the American Military is fighting.

And then our side will be legally entitled to shoot them.

It's a Neo-Con's dream.

The Gunslinger