Thursday, August 16, 2007

Backwards Up the Tree of Life

I just had a spiritual world-view altering thought. It happens. My mind is like an cluttered attic in an old house; you never know what you'll discover when you go rummaging around.

As I've said here before, I'm not a believing Christian (though I am a defender of it, because it wrought Western Civilization), but I am not an atheist either. I tend toward the general spiritual view that the Great Spirit/God/Goddess/Cosmic Intelligence/Creator IS creation,...and that the universe and everything in it consists of emanations of Him/Her/It, and is animated by Him/Her/It.

I think it's likely there are more worlds than the material one and that they run the gamut from slightly less dense than ours to those of pure spirit, and that each has inhabitants of the same order.

Now, Christians, Buddhists, Jews, Kabbalists, New Agers, Theosophists, Hermetics, etc. presume that pure spirit is the highest form of being. And that the less material one is, the higher one's spiritual quotient. By definition then, material entities are the lowest on the spiritual evolutionary scale and their goal is to rise from their primordialness into less and less dense energy until they can, with heads unbowed, share the planes of glory with the exalted entities that exist on those "higher" planes, closest to the divine source.

But, why should that be so?

It seems to me it takes quite a spiritual constitution to survive all the depredations of living in the material world. The seductions of the flesh are monumental. Sex is but one of the sensuous joys of being material. Eating, sneezing, sunlight on skin, dancing, smelling a forest or the salt air of the ocean, petting an animal, seeing a sunset or a master's painting, bathing, laughing, hearing music...What disembodied pleasure can compare with those?

And the difficulties are harsh. We have DEATH to contend with. Pain, disease, loneliness, grief, loss...are you kidding? What bodiless calamity compares to these?

Perhaps I am too enamored of the material world...but I cannot imagine that weak, immature, "starter" souls would not be drowned in the sensuous delights and/or morbid fears of physical existence.

So here's my theory:
Any soul inhabiting a body on the material plane is a probably a highly evolved spiritual entity who has reached the level of knowledge, wisdom and control that permits the risk of attempting to cope with corporeality.

Being human is not the bottom of the heap spiritually. We're not the "lost" ones, or the "fallen" ones or spiritual "children". We are the souls who are advanced enough, and courageous enough to clothe ourselves in flesh, to withstand the seductions and suffer the pains in the crucible of materiality—and (hopefully) survive with soul intact—to complete our spiritual journey.
Rather than this being the beginning point, this is the graduation ceremony. A well-seasoned, well-traveled soul, when it is ready to graduate to perfection...comes here for the final test.

It's the Bar exam, the Olympic event. And you have to get the Gold...a perfect score.

Everyone doesn't make it the first time. Hence, reincarnation. It's pretty obvious to all of us that some are better at it than others. But none of us are novices in this Spiritual business. If you made it far enough to be born in the Physical Universe...as a human on Earth...you are a marvel of spiritual growth already.

The challenge is to live up to our spiritual potential.

There are probably some souls who find the physical challenge too great, retreat a grade to train better, to study up for a century or two, before trying again. (Maybe that's the Astral Plane that psychics talk about, where souls rest after incarnation...before another try at the Big Safari!)

I think that sometimes unprepared souls who are not ready for the challenge of the Dark Continent try anyway and become the spectacular meltdowns and the flaming wrecks that appear among us occasionally.

I don't have a complete theology that weaves this idea into a coherent whole. But here's a bare bones idea. Souls emanated out of the Cosmic Intelligence begin their journey with baby steps, coming to sentient awareness of their individuality, and work toward spiritual maturity on a number of spirit planes from "the top down"—from pure spirit, where individuality is almost non-existent, down the ladder to total separation via material existence. The goal is to perfect the emanated individual soul into a conscious, unique god entity.

If you think about it, working it the other way round doesn't make any sense. If you start with undifferentiated Divinity, why bother with all this mess if that's what you want to end up with anyway? Which is exactly what all religions and mysticisms—behind their myths—teach. The goal of "Union with God"; the undifferentiated "Oneness" of Nirvana or Heaven.

I don't believe in creation by a transcendent God, but rather in the outpouring of spirit itself becoming "creation", which more closely resembles the process of birth, were the infant initially has no self-awareness, and cannot differentiate itself from its surroundings or its mother. So the soul newly emanated from the Cosmic Spirit, rather than being a more perfect specimen than one who has evolved all the way to corporeality, doesn't even yet know itself as itself, and must grow in maturity as it traverses the path from Pure Spirit to Material Manifestation.

The Kabbalists use the Tree of Life to demonstrate the emanation flowing from the top (pure divinity) to the bottom (physical manifestation). And they teach that each station, and the intelligences abiding there, are more pure and more advanced than the one below. Grant they may be more "pure" in that they are less defined and differentiated, less individual (and less interesting) , but certainly not more advanced. In no process is something closer to its source, less complex and individuated called "more advanced" than that which has evolved further from its beginning and become more complex and unique. This applies to crystals, cacti, tadpoles, children, biospheres and cultures.

I think the organizational rules of creation are consistent. As Above, So Below. Therefore the more we evolve from our source into more defined, self-aware, differentiated, individualized entities, the more advanced we are.

Goodness or Perfection must be a choice or it is only an instinct for which a soul cannot take credit. Choice cannot exist without individuality, independence and self-consciousness. Individuality, independence and self-consciousness cannot exit without separation from non-differentiation, and autonomy. Therefore, the only entities that can be GOOD are those who as independent, separate and autonomous beings, choose Goodness. Entities too close to, and in the thrall of Divinity may act good, but they are not self-directed actors, and therefore cannot claim godhood. They are like the fingers of a hand that blesses, but cannot bless (or curse) of their own volition.

So all those Angels may have more beautifully shining countenances that us sweaty humans...but don't let them intimidate you. You're farther down the path to god-ness than they are!

The Gunslinger

6 comments:

  1. Interesting, to say the least.

    I'll have to think about it a bit more, but here are my initial thoughts (and of course these are reactions sprung from my own spirituality, and thus should be taken with a grain of salt):

    1. I have heretofore believed that I am not a Created Being so much as I am a manifestation of Divinity. As God/Goddess/Creator/Spirit cannot manifest corporeally, thus Deity can not experience Him/Her/Itself. My physicality, as part of the Whole, allows the Whole to experience itself.

    2. It stands to reason, if there is such a thing in spiritual discussions, that your theory fits with mine in a way I hadn't previously considered. What fun!!

    I shall ruminate.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Another notion, common among the religious is that life is a "vale of tears", ending in the tragedy of death; that it's something we want to be freed from. Buddha's whole story was about getting free of the wheel of reincarnation, because life meant suffering. How sad is that?

    His teaching? Don't get excited about anything, don't have desires, don't form attachments.What a drag! And this is supposed to be a smart guy?

    He's saying, "don't love, you might get hurt", "don't sing,you might be off key", "don't dance, you might look silly." Oh, and "don't eat meat."

    What kind of way is THAT to live? If I believed in that, I wouldn't want to spend much time here either, I guess. What would be the point?

    Christians are "fallen", sinful and wicked, and the flesh is weak and corrupt.

    That sounds like fun.

    The Muslims...well never mind.

    I think life is beautiful beyond all imagination;unthinkably glorious. We take it so for granted we don't notice the insanely amazing things that we see, touch, hear, smell, taste, feel every day.

    Have you ever driven down a summer highway with all the windows down and the radio on? I get goosebumps just remembering it. You can only do that if you have a body. How can anybody feel that feeling and not love life?

    And part of what makes it so brilliant is its transience. DEATH makes life dear, precious, and sublime.

    Death is the cause of and the price we pay for the magnificence of life.

    I think we make a conscious decision to return, knowing that we may suffer and will surely die...because it's WORTH IT.

    I'm not saying that joys of the spirit aren't wondrous, I'm just saying that seeing a sunset with mortal eyes is a pretty special thing too. Falling in love, having sex, having a baby...laughing till your stomach hurts...being tickled, cuddling your cat...even God must want to do that!

    I think most religions are founded by the depressed, living in depressing times.

    And I think they've got it just about ass-backwards in every conceivable way.

    But, hey, what the hell do I know.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Interesting - though you seem to have more knowledge about guns than theology.

    Reincarnation seems to put God in a box: oops, that didn't turn out right, let's try again! Are you willing to take a chance in your reincarnation idea, that if you don't get it right you'll have another "opportunity", or are there eternal consequences for your choices in the here and now? Or maybe we are all just dust in the wind?

    If I get your reasoning right, the purpose of life is attaining some type of "perfection" based on some spirit-force creator's definition. How do you know if you're getting there, or if you're even heading in the right direction?

    I should stop with the questions, but I'll slip one more in. What is love?

    [Yes, I'm Christian and it hurts my heart to see you think that Christianity is some type of head-bashing you're-not-good-enough club. I'm somewhat new to your site, but I appreciate that you seem to reign in Christian bashing tendencies. It's not a Christian movie at all, but if you have not seen Defending Your Life you may want to check it out.]

    ReplyDelete
  4. Yes, my feelings exactly, Gunny... God experiences these things - these incredible, messy, embodied things - because we do. :-)

    And Marc, I don't think Gunny is saying that "the purpose of life" is attaining a sort of spiritual perfection, I think she's saying that the gift of corporeal life is an indicator that whatever our cohesive energy is (soul, for some) has evolved to a point where the experience of embodiment is another step toward fulfilling the "mission," if you will, of the Divine.

    Correct me if I've misunderstood, Gunny!

    I shall ruminate further.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hi Marc, Welcome!

    Oh dear no. I'm not a Christian basher at all. I was raised a Catholic, and educated in parochial school, and it has given me a good moral and intellectual and academic foundation.

    I honor Christianity as the basis of all that is good and free and honorable in Western Civilization. Without Christianity, the Free West would not be.

    But let me be clear. I don't believe in a Creator God in the sense that you do. I don't believe in a God "up there", who made creatures from dirt...utterly separate in nature from himself, who demands a particular sort of behavior from them in order to earn the reward of eternal life in paradise.

    I believe in a God/Source whose very essence flows out to become all created things. He is me and I am Him. You see?

    It's a very common sort of belief among occultists and mystics (even Christian ones.)

    It is, I suppose, the blasphemy of saying we are ALL in the exact same relation to God as Christians believe Jesus is. We are all actual, for-real offspring of the divine source. We are of the same Spirit essence as God, in the way our human bodies are of the same physical essence as our human parents.

    And it is our job as souls to grow up to be fully functioning sons and daughters of God, sharing in his divine nature. But, like human children, we have to grow, learn, struggle, separate, find ourselves, develop, and mature before we can reach "adulthood"....or in this case..."Godhood".

    I don't want to offend you, because I respect your right to your belief, but since you ask, I have no fears whatever of eternity. I am utterly certain that the commonly understood anthropomorphic God of Christianity is no more real than the Roman Jupiter...though rather less entertaining.

    As to how I know when I'm doing it right? We all do. It's part of our Spiritual Birthright. It may not be easy...but we're never in doubt.

    And any human who tells you otherwise is lying.

    The worst criminal torturer, tortured himself will cry for mercy. He understand mercy.

    The thief who is robbed demands the police retrieve his property. He undertands proper ownership.

    The convicted killer files appeal after appeal to save himself from execution. He understands the value of life.

    We all know.

    Jeffrey Dalmer would consider it quite bad table manners if someone ate him.

    Muslim terrorists get quite put out when someone kills their children.

    Tyrants and bullies are the first to cower, cry and protest their treatment if maltreated.

    We all know.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Yes, Daughter...right! Exactly!

    And that you have to be a pretty solid spiritual citizen to dare the material plane. No sissies or baby souls allowed!

    ReplyDelete