Tuesday, July 31, 2007

Mexican Criminal? American Justice?

I just got this email from FAXDC.com, a political action website. I'm assuming it's supposed to make me angry that innocent Americans were killed by a Mexican truck driver.

But this seems such a horrible miscarriage of justice, in only succeeds in making me feel sorry for the hapless, unlucky driver.

Has nobody in this country ever heard of an ACCIDENT? Is EVERYTHING somebody's FAULT...somebody's CRIMINAL FAULT?

Rather than fax my representatives to stop Mexican trucking in the U.S., this moves me to start an Appeal Fund for this unhappy man.

I'm all for Conservative/Patriotic action, but please people, can we get a little perspective here? This is a horrifying story of tragedy and misplaced outrage, of vengeance, and the corruption of the legal system by people who are unwilling to accept the fact that SHIT HAPPENS...
"A trucker who plowed his trailer rig into a traffic jam on Interstate 15 last year killing four people and injuring six was sentenced to four to 24 years in prison. Milson Sabino Oliveira Filho, 52, sobbed and his body shook as he talked of his remorse about the crash and said faulty brakes were to blame for the deaths. "I was about to get off on the Cheyenne exit and at the last minute I decided not to and lost control of my truck," Oliveira, who speaks Spanish, told Senior District Judge Charles Thompson through an interpreter.

Could YOUR Family be the Victim of Unsafe Mexican Trucks?

Oliveira, a Mexican trucker, was driving a trailer full of paper pulp from Utah to Southern California about 9:25 p.m. Nov. 16 when he barreled up behind traffic that had slowed to a crawl in a construction zone on the southbound side of the freeway near Cheyenne Avenue. Oliveira said his speed was 50 mph, but Chief Deputy District Attorney L.J. O'Neale said investigators estimated it was 60 mph. O'Neale said he believed fatigue also played a role in the crash. Oliveira's driving logs were inaccurate, but investigators were able to determine that he had been driving for 7 1/2 more hours than federal regulations allow, O'Neale said. Federal hours-of-service rules allow interstate commerce truckers to drive up to 11 hours in any 14-hour shift before they must take 10 consecutive hours off. Oliveira said his brakes failed him. "I tried to stop the truck by throwing it against the divider," Oliveira said as he wept. "I kept doing that but it wouldn't stop."

Thirteen vehicles were part of the pileup in front of Oliveira's truck. The collision catapulted the car being driven by Robert Allen Newsted Jr., killing the 31-year-old steel company supervisor. His infant son was strapped into a car seat and survived the wreck. But everyone in the first vehicle struck by the 18-wheeler died: Arturo Cortez, 69, his wife Estrellita, 64, and their 7-year-old granddaughter Kayla, who was in the backseat. The truck dragged the Cortezes' car "for more than 100 feet, leaving, I'm sorry to say, body parts in the road," O'Neale said. Virginia resident and U.S. Air Force member Sarah Hamilton used her jacket to cover Kayla's body, the prosecutor said. Other Air Force personnel who, like Hamilton, had been driving away from Nellis Air Force Base at the time of the crash, parked a vehicle on I-15 to block the little girl's body from traffic, O'Neale said. Kayla's father, Arturo Cortez Jr., was in the courtroom for Oliveira's sentencing.

Oliveira pleaded guilty to seven counts of reckless driving in exchange for prosecutors dropping four counts of involuntary manslaughter.

Support HR3074 and Stop the Mexican Trucks!

Already an amendment introduced by three members of the House of Representatives aims to cut off all funding for any sort of cross-border program with Mexican motor carriers. Members of the House have begun consideration of HR3074, the Transportation-HUD appropriations bill for fiscal year 2008. Reps. Peter DeFazio, D-OR, Duncan Hunter, R-CA, Gary Miller, R-CA, and Nancy Boyda, D-KS, introduced an amendment to the legislation calling for a stop of all funding for cross-border trucking programs with Mexico.

TAKE ACTION NOW!"


Don't get me wrong, I want a 30 foot wall on the Mexican border, with gun towers...OK? But there is something very wrong with a country that sentences an unlucky driver to years in prison for causing an accident.

And all the descriptions of infant fatalities, and body parts on the road does not change the fact that it was unforeseeable happenstance. The larger the scope of a tragedy does not increase the unlawfulness of the participants as this article seems to insist.

If I trip over a crack in the sidewalk, fall down, knocking over an old man in a walker, and he skins his knee...is that an accident?

If he hits his head on the pavement and dies...is that manslaughter?

If he's carrying his twin infant grand-daughters and they hit their heads and die too...is it murder?

What if I've been walking for hours? What if my vision is "impaired" by sunglasses? What if I'm wearing high heels? What if I've drunk a beer? What if I'm talking on my cell phone? Or walking with a friend visiting...and don't see the hazard on the sidewalk...is that negligence?

When exactly does tripping on the sidewalk become a CRIME in today's America? If you think this is a joke, you haven't been paying attention. More and more EVERYTHING and ANYTHING can be a crime in America. You don't need to be a criminal to end up in prison, you just need to be unlucky once.

This is an outrageous story alright...but not for the reasons the idiots who sent it to me think. And if Conservatives miss the essential, fundamental badness in this story, what hope is there?

The Gunslinger

9 comments:

  1. 7 1/2 hours over alloted driving time and bad brakes is negligence. I would call it first degree murder, the same as if you had a few beers and went driving.

    When someone drives faulty machinery in a knowingly impaired state then they are responsible. These are the kinds of people who should be lynched by the side of the highway and left as a warning to others.

    I thought conservatives were about responsibility?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Go Gunny, GO!

    Could you post this article on TFFJ?

    This story needs as much coverage as we can give it!

    Cheers, Ronbo

    ReplyDelete
  3. anon-

    You've got a lot of stuff going on here.

    Knowingly impaired? Minder reader?
    Being tired is now an illegal condition? Arrest everybody commuting 2 hours in heavy traffic on the way home after a full day's work. Illegally driving while tired. Attempted murder on the road.

    Arrest any drive who is the parent of an infant. They NEVER get enough sleep. They LIVE tired. Attempted murder on the road.

    Arrest everyone driving home Sunday night after a weekend of skiing, or swimming, or gambling. Illegally driving while tired. Attempted murder on the road.

    Arrest anyone who does not have a certified mechanic do a complete systems check of their car every time they drive it. Since anything can go wrong with a car at any time, not doing such a systems check must be considered negligence, disdain for the health and safety of others, and attempted murder on the road.

    Whew! I sure don't want to live in your world.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I see 'an accident' (they do tend to happen).

    ReplyDelete
  5. In America, less and less do "accidents" happen.

    Because, if we can blame a "cause", we can prevent it from ever happening again!

    Random events terrify sheep.

    These are the same people who believe life can be perfected...and perfectly safe. And they want to control everything and everyone to make sure of it.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Once again the shelterd city dwellers showing ignorance of the blue collar world.

    7 1/2 hours over regs behind the wheel of a truck is not like working a double shift at the office. The driving hours rules are there for good reasons, and yes, anyone who is knowingly impaired should be held fully responsible when they get behind the wheel. You would use force against people to protect dogs from cruelty, but to protect people you won't accept any inconvenience?

    A driver is required to perform an inspection of his truck every day. Brakes do fail unexpectedly, but seldom under those conditions without forewarning.

    So someone breaks the law putting others in danger for the sake of a quick buck and the ensueing fatalities should be regarded as an accident?

    I do not believe that the world can be perfected, but not being a moral relativist either, I too believe that using force is justified to keep stupidity and evil at bay. I just prefer protecting people to dogs.

    ReplyDelete
  7. A sad situation, and you can't help but feel bad for the trucker. I'm sure he was just trying to make a living for his family, I doubt he's evil. Still, he did break the law. Commercial drivers are held to a higher standard by law because of the danger they pose by driving around in a 80,0000 pound vehicle. Had he followed federal laws for "hours of service", things may have been different. Ah, but does Mexico have a hours of service law? Does Mexico have a required annual inspection? That's the problem. American trucks have to have an annual inspection to make sure they meet American federal guidelines. These inspections help keep us all safer.

    To me it's no different than an airline pilot flying for too many hours, at some point it goes from getting in a few hours of overtime to negligence and putting people's life in danger. Of course somebody lets that pilot fly and somebody dispatched that trucker with the load. The company that trucker works for should have known he was over his hours and put him out of service. Sorry, as bad as I feel for the guy I can't say this is an "accident". Tragedy? yes, but too many laws were ignored to call this a accident.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Me too, dude. I just think there are such things as "accidents".

    Something the sheep fear, because it makes the world a random and dangerous place. And in my opinion, this is an example of them trying to control what is uncontrollable; demanding a pound of flesh to keep their illusion safe...not enforcing sensible laws.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Guys, let me be clear...I don't know any more about this than this single story. If there is a followup story showing bald negligence...I stand corrected.

    It reminds me of the recent story about the two news choppers that crashed into each other while covering a police chase.

    Because people died in the crash, they're talking about charging the running suspect with MURDER!

    Does that seem reasonable, too?

    It just feels like the same knee-jerk reaction is at work in both stories.

    And it creeps me out.

    ReplyDelete