I don't have all the facts, but I heard on the news this morning that whites now comprise only 2/3 of the population of America.
I don't know much about demography, population replacement, birthrates, and statistics, but that sounds to me very like the end of our White homeland.
Whites don't have a lot of babies. Mexicans and Muslims do. In a couple of generations, it seems to me, there will be more of "them" than "us". And yes, I am speaking racially. I am also speaking culturally, because in today's America, we do not require assimilation, loyalty, Americanization, English or any other means by which different immigrants become "American."
In the not too distant future, White People will be a minority in a land they built. Very like South Africa. (South Africa did NOT have a majority Black population in the beginning. It was a very sparsely populated area. It was only after the Whites built a bustling, prosperous and successful country that the Blacks came pouring in for jobs that were nowhere to be found in Black Africa.)
They did not build South Africa, they stole it. The Mexicans didn't build America, but they're on their way to stealing it.
And what happened to South Africa (and Rhodesia...a country with the same history) will happen to America as well: Whites subjected to abuse, dispossessed and murdered. Their businesses and institutions cannibalized, their traditions destroyed. Both countries have descended into barbarism, poverty, famine, violence, tribal and racial strife.
Welcome to the "NEW" America.
I don't think anything except this issue is of any importance anymore. Unless we hold on to our country, every other issue is moot. Abortion, guns, welfare, war, socialism, democracy, tyranny, history, culture, language, education, gay marriage, drugs, the economy, borders....all will be decided by invaders and foreigners who don't have any stake in our nation. None of it will be in our own control anyway. Arguing about it here or anywhere before we assure the continuing existence of America for Americans and by Americans—in the Historical sense—is academic abstraction.
If we can't get our country back, close the borders, deport all illegals and stop, permanently, any immigration from Third World countries, we may have to face the choice of seceding from the United States of America, and forming a new "Confederacy", of original, historical, traditional, Constitutional, and yes, (horrors!) White America.
Or at the least ONLY people who recognize, value, accept and wish to perpetuate OUR cultural inheritance, no matter what their color is.
This, naturally, will be considered a "racist" screed. But I am beyond caring. I see what I see. And what I see is every White country in the world being invaded by Brown and Black immigrants who want what we have because their own countries/cultures/races have not succeeded in creating prosperous countries of their own. They want ours. And they will ruin it just as surely and completely as South Africa and Rhodesia have been ruined.
Japan is Japanese, China is Chinese, Mexico is Mexican. America should be American...by which I mean the Americans that built her: European-Americans.
Black slaves, Chinese coolies, Mexican farm workers notwithstanding...this country was founded, conquered, defended, built and made prosperous, successful, powerful, rich and great because of the skill, work-ethic, knowledge, faith, hope, honor, industriousness, loyalty, sacrifice, toughness, and love of White Americans and White European Immigrants who were PROUD and GRATEFUL to become Americans.
Anybody who tells you different—even that politically correct history book your kid got from his government school—is a liar.
The Gunslinger
Joebama American citizens 2024 print
3 months ago
*standing ovation*
ReplyDeleteI agree completely and I'm damned tired of being called a racist anytime I mention the points you've made.
ReplyDeleteWhere are we going to secede to though? My wonderful Texas is overrun and getting more liberal every year. Which states could we gather together under our flag? And will there be enough brave people to join us?
Thanks mrsmith!
ReplyDeleteDaphne...I know. I love Texas. And I was always sort of planning to "end up there"...
But now, it's on its way to becoming Tejas...just like my state is Mexifornia. I don't know if we'll be able to pull it off. But so far, there's YOU and ME. I guess that's a start.
I've got a couple of people...and you've got a couple of people. Let's make that the start of our national "movement"! (grin)
Let's keep in touch!
TG
If such a thing were to come about, would limeys be welcome?
ReplyDeleteBalls to this multiculturalism. Why should well sell our identity. If they want to build a society like that then pick an uninhabited island and start one there. Don’t sell out our homelands because they saw some multicultural planet on star trek or something and now have fantasies. Ball to the lot of em!
ReplyDeletewww.IanMacNb.net
Well Americans are only British colonial so we should be allowed in. We are the same nationality in the long run. That goes for Austrians and new Zealanders and Canadians and all the other places we moved to. Ah makes you proud to be British. Our empire rocked.
ReplyDeletewww.IanMacNb.net
I seem to remember a little unpleasantness a while back when the Americans decided they wanted to be their own people. Something about 'independence', I think. Since then, they've gone on from strength to strength and our empire has fallen into a multicultural hellhole. I'm happy to be proud to be English, but I wonder how much use the term 'British' has anymore.
ReplyDeleteBy the way my top comment was talking in anger at the culprits and not you. I agree with everything you say. Johns thrown us into a confusing circle of confusion. I don’t even know if he’s talking about any comment at all.
ReplyDeletewww.IanMacNb.net
Can't we get a windy island somewhere to start over? Greenland? Anybody have any info on Nw Zealand's Southern island?
ReplyDeleteWhy a windy island? We want a warm sunny one. High from the sea so it will not flood.
ReplyDeletewww.IanMacNb.net
The nastier the climate the less likely it is for the self-indulgent to follow.
ReplyDeleteOr we could put large guns around the boarders of our island. That will teach the trespassers a lesson. I am sure the owner of this blog would proudly supply us!
ReplyDeletewww.IanMacNb.net
You guys are great! Your comments made me realize we need a plan!
ReplyDeleteHere's my first thought:
We take over a State (or States) in the United States. Not with arms, but with voters. We need to move into a State en masse, until critical mass is reached and people with our ideas are the vast majority.
Side Bar: If California can allow Mexican illegals sanctuary and services and rights and privileges, and (soon) the vote, in violation of Federal Law, OUR state can extend that to Brits and New Zealanders and Aussies and Canadians and any Europeans we happen to like while deporting anybody we don't want!
The United States...is just that: Individual States United. And, I think it's very different than most other countries.
The States would not sign on to a Constitution creating a Federal Government until they got plenty of guarantees of their own relative independence.
And those guarantees are still in that document. Even if the Supreme Court, and the Federal Government often act as though they aren't.
I could be wrong, but I think a State could police it's borders, arrest illegals, police and close Mosques they considered dangerous, or refuse to allow Muslims to settle there. It could outlaw affirmative action, hate laws, anti-smoking regulations, or anything else it wanted. It could determine the curricula of the schools, approve school texts, or draft its own, demand the adequacy of teachers, and outlaw their unions.
They could eliminate welfare, bilingual anything, state provided translators; require English proficiency to vote, drive, hold office, or get a business or State license of any kind...
...and many other things that would infuriate the Federal Government, the Liberal Courts and their multi-culti masters.
The Feds would have two option: a) Cut off all Federal Funding, and b) Invade the State.
I don't think a State should accept Federal Funding. Even though it is very handy and lovely to have lots of money. The slavery it begets is obvious to every citizen in America who believes in freedom. Our States have given over their sovereignity to the Feds for the welfare handouts...and become bound and beholden to the National Government. It's an evil thing that should be stopped in any case.
As for invading a State? It would create the ultimate Constitutional Crisis...and paralyze the Government. And if the Feds ever invaded a State to force submission to Washington, many other States would go ballistic.
I think a State...could...if they were willing to go for it, defy Washington and it's Mult-Cultural masters and get away with it.
I think it's possible, in the real world, to set up a place of our own, without firing a shot.
Of course, that would be just the beginning...
The State or States we choose will have to be fairly lightly populated, and with citizens of a similar mind already. Naturally, those States will be the least hospitable. Wyoming, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Idaho.
They are all rugged states, with extreme weather.
But it was the Vikings from the frigid North, not the Natives from the luxuriant tropics that became a powerful and great people.
Perhaps we have to continue as we began if we are to continue at all.
Remember, this is the danger that California faces as we speak, an invasion of Mexicans that will change the culture and the nature of the State by sheer numbers. If THEY can do it, so can we!
Lots of good points in that last, GS, so here's my own thoughts by point, for whatever they're worth:
ReplyDelete"You guys are great! Your comments made me realize we need a plan!
Here's my first thought:
We take over a State (or States) in the United States. Not with arms, but with voters. We need to move into a State en masse, until critical mass is reached and people with our ideas are the vast majority."
Carpet-bagging, eh? Sounds like a good idea, and I think it's been shown to be pretty successful, just look at the demographic takeover of Europe!
"Side Bar: If California can allow Mexican illegals sanctuary and services and rights and privileges, and (soon) the vote, in violation of Federal Law, OUR state can extend that to Brits and New Zealanders and Aussies and Canadians and any Europeans we happen to like while deporting anybody we don't want!"
Sweeet. But you don't stand a chance in making it a State legal thing in one move. If, on the other hand, you start with a private housing/community complex with just the people you want invited and living there, you stand a better chance of growing a demographic without being noticed.
"I could be wrong, but I think a State could police it's borders, arrest illegals, police and close Mosques they considered dangerous, or refuse to allow Muslims to settle there. It could outlaw affirmative action, hate laws, anti-smoking regulations, or anything else it wanted. It could determine the curricula of the schools, approve school texts, or draft its own, demand the adequacy of teachers, and outlaw their unions.
They could eliminate welfare, bilingual anything, state provided translators; require English proficiency to vote, drive, hold office, or get a business or State license of any kind...
...and many other things that would infuriate the Federal Government, the Liberal Courts and their multi-culti masters.
The Feds would have two option: a) Cut off all Federal Funding, and b) Invade the State.
I don't think a State should accept Federal Funding. Even though it is very handy and lovely to have lots of money. The slavery it begets is obvious to every citizen in America who believes in freedom. Our States have given over their sovereignity to the Feds for the welfare handouts...and become bound and beholden to the National Government. It's an evil thing that should be stopped in any case.
As for invading a State? It would create the ultimate Constitutional Crisis...and paralyze the Government. And if the Feds ever invaded a State to force submission to Washington, many other States would go ballistic.
I think a State...could...if they were willing to go for it, defy Washington and it's Mult-Cultural masters and get away with it.
I think it's possible, in the real world, to set up a place of our own, without firing a shot.
Of course, that would be just the beginning...
The State or States we choose will have to be fairly lightly populated, and with citizens of a similar mind already. Naturally, those States will be the least hospitable. Wyoming, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Idaho.
They are all rugged states, with extreme weather.
But it was the Vikings from the frigid North, not the Natives from the luxuriant tropics that became a powerful and great people.
Perhaps we have to continue as we began if we are to continue at all.
Remember, this is the danger that California faces as we speak, an invasion of Mexicans that will change the culture and the nature of the State by sheer numbers. If THEY can do it, so can we!"
All agreed, but, again, we can't hope to take a State in toto in one swoop. It would need to be a takeover by degrees. In this, certainly, we can learn from our enemies.
Since you like the vikings, I can't but notice you left out Alaska. They also have oil.
ReplyDeleteOnce the left figures out what you're doing they'll swamp the place to stop you, like Kansas before the War of Northern Aggression. Everywhere a welfare check can reach, they have a voter base.
Stick to and island. At least there is water around it to stop people getting to us. As for Britain we have plenty round us. We just send boats planes and trains out to get immigrants. I can never work that one out. Why is our government we chomping at the bit to bring them over.
ReplyDeletewww.IanMacNb.net
Anonymous:
ReplyDeleteYou're right! I ALWAYS forget about Alaska!
On the second point: I'm thinkin' slackers really don't do well in rugged country. And, it'd be damned hard to get many limousine Liberals to give up the idea of the "culture" of the coasts to waste away in Idaho.
Give you odds...
Besides, do you think they'd really care if a despised and ignored State like North Dakota or Idaho went a little more rightwing? They'd just see a lot of people moving to some boring state they wouldn't live in anyway. They see things from a national perspective. They don't really think locally. They want the Presidency, the Federal Courts, the Congress.
I don't think the plan I'm suggesting would really register for Liberals. They don't value States except as electoral votes. And they've pretty much written off the stupid little Red States already.
Actually, I think they'd laugh at us, imagining that we were trying to pull some stunt to influence national politics in our dim-bulb, righwing bumpkin-like, ham-fisted, unsophisticated way. They 'd never imagine the real goal of removing ourselves from the Federal teat and its addendant overlordship. That's literally unthinkable for a Liberal. If we told them that's what we planned, they wouldn't believe us.
And when we pulled off the quasi-secession, it'd be too late. We'd have control of our borders...etc.
Haven't thought this through. Just my initial response. What do you think?
Congratulations! Excellent article.
ReplyDeleteYou are so right with your South African and Zim' comments.
Greetings from: Gun Owners of South Africa, www.gunownerssa.org
Yours in common cause,
Martin Hedington
Gauteng Regional Advocacy Director, (GOSA)
tv2h@telkomsa.net